Logo

Member News

photo collage of couples

August 2004

This page contains selected content from this month's "Conscious Dating Singles News."

See also:

 

ASK OUR COACHES

This column answers questions submitted by our readers. Submit your questions to

who will forward them to our coaches all over the world. Each issue, we'll publish a few answers from our RCI coaches.

THIS MONTH'S QUESTION:

"I met the "man of my dreams", or at least it seems that way. After only knowing him 4 weeks he has asked me to accompany him to Hawaii for 6 days. We have not been intimate up to this point, but I so want to go with him, how do I handle this in an adult manner?"

Signed, "Troubled""

THE COACHES RESPOND:

Mari answers…

Hawaii for six days - what a wonderful opportunity to deepen your friendship! I recommend you speak with your new beau about this situation before you go any further with plans for the trip. He may have a different picture in mind than you do about what the vacation looks like.

There are possibilities to explore for handling the intimacy aspect, such as getting separate rooms, a room with two beds, or whatever you are both comfortable with. If it's been four weeks and you have not yet been sexual with one another, this could be a good sign that he is a respectful gentleman.

Pick an appropriate time to discuss this sensitive topic with him. Speak from your heart; tell him how excited you are to get to know him better and that you're enjoying the comfortable pace of your budding relationship. Tell him you're concerned things could go too fast in Hawaii and you want to enlist his support. Be sure to really honor yourself and your own personal boundaries. In other words, speak up and ask for what you want. Women have way more influence over relationships than we give ourselves credit for. Men are typically fairly simple creatures who want their women to be happy.

Mari Smith | Million Dollar Relationships
858-488-8242
www.MillionDollarRelationships.com
Mari@MillionDollarRelationships.com

Annette answers…

Can you easily and safely discuss anything and everything related to this trip and your relationship? Before you agree to go, test if this is so. If not, I suggest you do not take this trip until you both can freely discuss anything on your minds.

Considering the short time you have been together, and that you may not know important things about each other, this trip together may propel your relationship in many ways too quickly to be solidly grounded.

You may need to set boundaries. For example, you could tell him that you will pay for your own separate hotel room, until you freely decide you no longer want a separate room. Seeing how willingly he accepts or rejects your boundaries could give you some indication of his respect and caring for you, important ingredients for a solid relationship. The trick is not to be mesmerized into fantasies and dreams, but to consciously choose what is right and appropriate for you.

Annette Carpien | Rich Journey Life and Relationship Coaching
610-428-2755
www.richjourneycoaching.com
Annette@richjourneycoaching.com

Nanette answers…

You state that you haven't been intimate "yet". Have you thought about whether you may be ready by the time the vacation rolls around, or are you planning to wait until you are a more committed couple? Either way, it is your choice and it should be done because you are ready, not because of pressure from vacationing together.

The simple answer is to spring for the cost of your own room. Ask the hotel what their cancellation policy is should you decide that you won't be needing the room for the full number of days you reserved -- in case you decide that you are ready to become 'roommates' while there.

You should also have a talk with your new beau to make sure that he doesn't have any "expectations". If he can't respect your boundaries in this area, it will be very telling as to whether he really is the"man of your dreams".

In fairness to you both, this is absolutely something that needs to be discussed before you commit to going along. Why ruin your vacation and risk blowing the relationship because of conflicting intentions once you are there.

Nanette Traetow, 630.858.6877

FEATURE ARTICLE

THE 13TH DATING TRAP
By David Steele

  • "She’s so hot!"
  • "He’s a hunk!"
  • "Men/Women are only after one thing."
  • "Why can’t men/women see past my body/bank account?"

Women commonly dislike being evaluated or pursued by men solely for their physical attractiveness, and men commonly dislike being evaluated or pursued by women for their job or money.

When we don’t know someone, it is natural to focus on the outside packaging. It is also understandable to be attracted to something that is very important to us, such as looks or money. Deep down we know that potential partners, like us, want to be viewed as multi-dimensional beings, not just a body or a wallet. Yet, in dating, whether straight or gay, young or old, unconscious singles commonly focus on the one big thing that attracts them, and then wonder why their relationships don’t work.

I propose the "PACKAGING TRAP" as the 13th Dating Trap.

In our culture we objectify people by focusing on their age, gender, race, clothes, hair, weight, job, finances, and other external characteristics, and make generalizations about who they are as a person. When scouting for potential partners, it is common for some singles to focus on the packaging first, then not see much else beyond that. This works both ways- rejecting some people because of their packaging, and pursuing others because of their packaging.

Focusing on packaging can interfere even when you don’t intend to. True personal story- Maggie and I met on Match.com only after she had the smarts to modify her search criterion when she wasn’t finding anyone compatible. My search missed her because I selected 5’ 2" as my minimum height (Maggie is 5’ 1 ½") and she selected her age and older (I’m 18 months younger). Neither of us intended to discriminate based upon such external packaging characteristics and reject potential partners younger or shorter! When Maggie modified her search criterion to include men a few years younger she found me, and I’m very glad she did.

It is understandable to have preferences and reactions to external packaging; however, if our goal is an internal experience, such as to be happy, loved, and fulfilled in a relationship, we may need to balance our attraction to the outside packaging by paying more attention to the person inside.

I recently had a conversation with a single friend who, after completing our Relationship Success Training for Singles program (RESTS), has been working with one of our relationship coaches for several years. He was frustrated about getting involved in relationships that appear promising in the beginning then don’t work out. He and I have had an on-going debate about his weight requirement- no more than 5 pounds overweight (I could never figure out how he would measure that!). Body shape was his first and primary sorting tool, pursuing women with great bodies (who were usually not attracted to him) and immediately rejecting women who were not slender. Still single and nearing retirement age, he was despairing of finding a partner. I like him a lot, wanted to see him happy in a relationship, and really wanted to help. This time, our conversation focused more specifically on the Law of Attraction, and how his weight "requirement" may be interfering with his success.

Remember, the Law of Attraction can work for you or against you. If you objectify others by focusing on their packaging, then you will probably be objectified in return. As a man objectifying women by their appearance my friend might be attracting women who objectify him by his appearance, job, money, car, or other external packaging characteristic, and might not be capable of the kind of relationship he really wants.

In our RESTS program, we specify that Requirements are almost always behavioral events in the relationship, not traits of a partner. This has been challenging for many singles that are used to making a list of what they want in their ideal partner. I like to say, "you can make a list of a hundred traits or qualities, find someone that meets all of them, and STILL be miserable."

We help singles refine their list and translate their requirements from traits of a partner into behavioral relationship events by asking "What does _____ mean to you?" and"What must happen in your relationship to be _____?" Any personal trait or characteristic can be transformed into a behavioral relationship event, such as "Good listener" into "Good communication" or "Deep listening to each other." The more specific and bottom-line- the better. Most requirements go both ways and involve both partners, such as "good communication" and"addiction-free."

Balance is the key. RCI coach Mike McCartney said "JUST the outside without the inside won't work. JUST the inside without the outside won't work for the vast majority," and I agree. It is natural to have some requirements related to packaging, such as race, height, age, and even body type or weight, but I prefer to de-emphasize focusing on packaging that doesn’t have much to do with a quality relationship, and emphasize what is required to have the life and relationship you want.

In practice, very few external characteristics pass the requirements test- "If you were totally in love and really wanted this relationship to work, would you break it off because of _____?"

The 2001 movie "Shallow Hal" has a great example of this. Jack Black as Hal, a single guy obsessed with external packaging, was hypnotized to see only the person inside and pursued Gwyneth Paltrow’s illusionary slim character. Then, when the hypnotic spell broke and he saw her actual obesity, he decided that her weight didn’t interfere with his love and desire for her.

My friend held steadfastly to his weight requirement, fearing that if he let go of it, he would end up with someone he was not physically attracted to. I tried to reassure him that with the Law of Attraction "like attracts like," and if he let go of focusing on weight he might be opening the door for his soul mate- a wonderful woman who is attracted to him, to whom he too will be attracted.

At the end of the evening, my friend still seemed skeptical, but he said I gave him a lot to think about. I hope he can let go and give the Law of Attraction a chance to work for him- at this point he has nothing to lose!

The 13th Dating Trap (to be added to the current "12 Dating Traps"):

PACKAGING TRAP: Focusing on outside packaging, such as someone’s body, looks, job, wealth, material possessions, etc, overlooking the reality of the person inside. Opposite of the Marketing Trap; instead of seeking to sell yourself with attractive packaging, you focus on the packaging of others.

SOLUTION: Define your requirements for the life and relationship you really want and seek to balance your attraction to the packaging by paying attention to the reality of the person inside.

© 2004 by David Steele / All right reserved